Quick, sharp and bite-sized, Radar distills the trending business-meets-culture stories from APAC to the Middle East to global markets into what you need to know. If it’s on our radar, it should be on yours.
Taylor Swift’s latest cinematic experiment, The Official Release Party of a Showgirl has grossed an estimated US$33 million as reported by the New York Times, across the United States and Canada, and $13 million overseas, drastically outperforming A24’s The Smashing Machine, the Dwayne Johnson-led Oscar hopeful that opened at $6 million. The 89-minute project—part concert film, part behind-the-scenes feature—served as an extended promotional vehicle for Swift’s newest album rather than a traditional theatrical release.
According to Comscore data quoted by the New York Times, Showgirl played across 3,700 theatres, drawing an audience that was 88% female and 70% white, while earning an A+ CinemaScore from fans. The film’s global take, including overseas earnings, now sits at $46 million. The rollout, announced just two weeks before opening, relied almost entirely on Swift’s own social media footprint, bypassing conventional marketing campaigns. By contrast, The Smashing Machine, starring Dwayne Johnson and Emily Blunt, cost around $40 million to make and has struggled to recoup costs despite strong reviews.
Swift’s surprise one-weekend run also overshadowed Paul Thomas Anderson’s One Battle After Another, which slipped to second place with $11.1 million. Her unorthodox model of limited release, direct fan engagement, and zero reliance on traditional advertising has delivered a box-office boost for cinema owners still reeling from a sluggish summer, marking another data point in her ongoing disruption of legacy systems, from record labels to theatrical distribution.
BTB So What?
You don’t need BTB to tell you Taylor Swift is powerful, but Showgirl reveals the extent to which that power has become structural. Swift has effectively built a vertically integrated cultural enterprise: she conceives the product, controls its narrative, owns the channels of distribution, and mobilises a self-sustaining community that acts as both audience and amplifier. Few artists or brands command that kind of end-to-end ecosystem. And her impact is measurable; The Eras Tour generated an estimated US$5 billion in consumer spending in the United States alone, the scale of a national stimulus programme. That figure reframes her not as a performer but as an economic engine, one capable of moving markets and altering spending patterns at a macro level.
At this moment, Swift is the cultural equilibrium point, closing the world’s most profitable tour, releasing a new album, commanding online debate, and leading the box office simultaneously. Her success illustrates that cultural influence, when compounded by ownership and precision storytelling, still outperforms paid reach or algorithmic strategy. For most of the entertainment world, 2025 has been defined by contraction. For Taylor Swift, it’s been anything but a cruel summer.